TESTIMONIALS
“Your company has worked with me many times. Advertising has been so easy for us and your prices are very reasonable…applicants have mentioned they have seen the ad in your magazine when looking for a new position (with us).”
– Carol Dyer, New Mexico State University
"Congratulations on the substance and quality of your magazine."
– Carmen Garcia Ruiz
Organizational Effectiveness Professional, Diversity and Inclusion Professional
“I was thrilled to find my first job in higher education through INSIGHT Into Diversity. I would recommend it as a great place to search, recruit and browse.”
– Myrtho M. Blanchard, MALD, Director of Human Resources at Northern Virginia Community College
“Congratulations on your new look and interesting new editorial features. INSIGHT Into Diversity is a first-class publication and more than ever merits ours and our clients’ attention. Keep up the good work."
– Allan G. Sacks, Executive Vice President, The Graystone Group
“INSIGHT Into Diversity has always been sensitive to our needs to advertise and attract high quality minority candidates to fill our faculty positions at Texas A&M. INSIGHT Into Diversity has always given me a quick turn around and fair price for the advertisements we place with them. I know Texas A&M’s ranking for placement of well-qualified minority candidates has greatly increased over the past 3-5 years as a result of the visibility our positions receive in the INSIGHT Into Diversity”
– Kaye L. Matejka, Business Administrator II, Texas A&M University
Our Certifications

Divided Appeals Court Strikes Down Michigan's Affirmative Action Ban |
On July 1, a divided federal appeals court struck down Michigan's controversial ban on consideration of race and gender in college admissions. The 2-1 panel at the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded the voter-approved ban on "preferential treatment" at state colleges and universities was unconstitutional, and "alters Michigan's political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities." The issue is likely to renew the national, political and legal debate over affirmative action, which the Supreme Court could be poised to resolve in the coming months. The affirmative action ban was passed five years ago in a referendum and was added to the state's constitution, barring publicly funded centers of higher education from granting "preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin." That prompted a series of lawsuits and appeals from various groups. Click here to read more.
|











On July 1, a divided federal appeals court struck down Michigan's controversial ban on consideration of race and gender in college admissions. The 2-1 panel at the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded the voter-approved ban on "preferential treatment" at state colleges and universities was unconstitutional, and "alters Michigan's political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities." The issue is likely to renew the national, political and legal debate over affirmative action, which the Supreme Court could be poised to resolve in the coming months. The affirmative action ban was passed five years ago in a referendum and was added to the state's constitution, barring publicly funded centers of higher education from granting "preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin." That prompted a series of lawsuits and appeals from various groups.