TESTIMONIALS
“Your company has worked with me many times. Advertising has been so easy for us and your prices are very reasonable…applicants have mentioned they have seen the ad in your magazine when looking for a new position (with us).”
– Carol Dyer, New Mexico State University
"Congratulations on the substance and quality of your magazine."
– Carmen Garcia Ruiz
Organizational Effectiveness Professional, Diversity and Inclusion Professional
“I was thrilled to find my first job in higher education through INSIGHT Into Diversity. I would recommend it as a great place to search, recruit and browse.”
– Myrtho M. Blanchard, MALD, Director of Human Resources at Northern Virginia Community College
“Congratulations on your new look and interesting new editorial features. INSIGHT Into Diversity is a first-class publication and more than ever merits ours and our clients’ attention. Keep up the good work."
– Allan G. Sacks, Executive Vice President, The Graystone Group
“INSIGHT Into Diversity has always been sensitive to our needs to advertise and attract high quality minority candidates to fill our faculty positions at Texas A&M. INSIGHT Into Diversity has always given me a quick turn around and fair price for the advertisements we place with them. I know Texas A&M’s ranking for placement of well-qualified minority candidates has greatly increased over the past 3-5 years as a result of the visibility our positions receive in the INSIGHT Into Diversity”
– Kaye L. Matejka, Business Administrator II, Texas A&M University
Our Certifications
Supreme Court Issues Quick Opinion in Wal-Mart Class Action Case |
 In perhaps the quickest decision in its history, the United States Supreme Court ruled on April Fools Day that the free market could not withstand compensating victims of sex discrimination and that the nationwide class action case brought against Wal-Mart – for which oral arguments were heard March 29 – must be reversed. According to the 5-4 opinion written by Justice Alioto, class action suits for discrimination are not available “absent a written statement promoting a purely discriminatory hiring policy.” Alito had signaled his view that sex discrimination should not be actionable during oral argument, when he stated that if a company’s pay and promotion is “typical of the entire American work force,” then it should be immune from a Title 7 claim. Women and labor activists denounced the ruling, saying that the nation’s highest court has overturned fifty years of legal precedents in order to promote discriminatory hiring practices against women, racial minorities, and other groups covered by Title 7. Click here to read more.
|