TESTIMONIALS
“Your company has worked with me many times. Advertising has been so easy for us and your prices are very reasonable…applicants have mentioned they have seen the ad in your magazine when looking for a new position (with us).”
– Carol Dyer, New Mexico State University
"Congratulations on the substance and quality of your magazine."
– Carmen Garcia Ruiz
Organizational Effectiveness Professional, Diversity and Inclusion Professional
“I was thrilled to find my first job in higher education through INSIGHT Into Diversity. I would recommend it as a great place to search, recruit and browse.”
– Myrtho M. Blanchard, MALD, Director of Human Resources at Northern Virginia Community College
“Congratulations on your new look and interesting new editorial features. INSIGHT Into Diversity is a first-class publication and more than ever merits ours and our clients’ attention. Keep up the good work."
– Allan G. Sacks, Executive Vice President, The Graystone Group
“INSIGHT Into Diversity has always been sensitive to our needs to advertise and attract high quality minority candidates to fill our faculty positions at Texas A&M. INSIGHT Into Diversity has always given me a quick turn around and fair price for the advertisements we place with them. I know Texas A&M’s ranking for placement of well-qualified minority candidates has greatly increased over the past 3-5 years as a result of the visibility our positions receive in the INSIGHT Into Diversity”
– Kaye L. Matejka, Business Administrator II, Texas A&M University
Our Certifications

Does Sex Discrimination in Science Keep Women Down? |
Today, more than half of all PhDs in the life sciences are awarded to women, compared to a measly 13 percent bestowed upon women in 1970. However, women still lag far behind men in full professorships and tenure track positions in math-intensive fields. Despite claims that this disparity is due to discrimination against women in the processes of publication, grant review, interviewing, and hiring, a review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) last week, written by Stephen Ceci and Wendy Williams of Cornell University, finds that there is actually little evidence for sex discrimination in these areas, and concludes that women's underrepresentation stems from other causes. Click here to read more.
|











Today, more than half of all PhDs in the life sciences are awarded to women, compared to a measly 13 percent bestowed upon women in 1970. However, women still lag far behind men in full professorships and tenure track positions in math-intensive fields. Despite claims that this disparity is due to discrimination against women in the processes of publication, grant review, interviewing, and hiring, a review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) last week, written by Stephen Ceci and Wendy Williams of Cornell University, finds that there is actually little evidence for sex discrimination in these areas, and concludes that women's underrepresentation stems from other causes.