TESTIMONIALS
“You are more than welcome to tell other departments that your company has worked with me many times. Advertising has been so easy for us and your prices are very reasonable…applicants have mentioned they have seen the ad in your magazine when looking for a new position (with us).”
– Carol Dyer, New Mexico State University
"Congratulations on the substance and quality of your magazine."
– Carmen Garcia Ruiz
Organizational Effectiveness Professional, Diversity and Inclusion Professional
“I was thrilled to find my first job in higher education through INSIGHT Into Diversity. I would recommend it as a great place to search, recruit and browse.”
– Myrtho M. Blanchard, MALD, Director of Human Resources at Northern Virginia Community College
“Congratulations on your new look and interesting new editorial features. INSIGHT Into Diversity is a first-class publication and more than ever merits ours and our clients’ attention. Keep up the good work."
– Allan G. Sacks, Executive Vice President, The Graystone Group
“INSIGHT Into Diversity has always been sensitive to our needs to advertise and attract high quality minority candidates to fill our faculty positions at Texas A&M. INSIGHT Into Diversity has always given me a quick turn around and fair price for the advertisements we place with them. I know Texas A&M’s ranking for placement of well-qualified minority candidates has greatly increased over the past 3-5 years as a result of the visibility our positions receive in the INSIGHT Into Diversity”
– Kaye L. Matejka, Business Administrator II, Texas A&M University
Our Certifications

California Supreme Court: Affirmative Action Ban Not Unconstitutional |
The California Supreme Court ruled on August 2 that Proposition 209, the ballot measure that banned affirmative action by government, did not violate the federal Constitution. In a 6-1 ruling, the majority rejected a defense argued by San Francisco after it was sued over a program that gave women and minorities an advantage in obtaining city contracts. The court said the affirmative action program may continue only if the city shows it was narrowly tailored to address intentional discrimination by the city against businesses owned by women and minorities and that preferences were necessary to rectify the discrimination. Click here to read more.
|











The California Supreme Court ruled on August 2 that Proposition 209, the ballot measure that banned affirmative action by government, did not violate the federal Constitution. In a 6-1 ruling, the majority rejected a defense argued by San Francisco after it was sued over a program that gave women and minorities an advantage in obtaining city contracts. The court said the affirmative action program may continue only if the city shows it was narrowly tailored to address intentional discrimination by the city against businesses owned by women and minorities and that preferences were necessary to rectify the discrimination.